Why vs because




















Just like since , the conjunctive as rarely appears in a sentence that is contextless, and the context can often help disambiguate the meaning of as. Here are some real-world examples of the conjunctive as.

See which ones trip you up:. Gilbert, Thespis , I shall prepare my most plaintive airs against his return, in compassion to his feelings, as I know his horse will lose. This last example is cited by Garner as an example of the ambiguous as , but that seems to be reading ambiguity into a sentence where there is none.

What advice would we give? Since as a causal conjunction is almost unremarkable except to a few stick-in-the-muds, and is sometimes preferable when you want the cause to be less directly linked to the effect.

When in doubt, you can always default to because , since no one finds fault with it. Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Log in Sign Up. Usage Notes 'Since' vs. More Words At Play. Adverbial prepositional phrases with because of modify verbs in the exact same way. Here are the same sentences with because of instead of - ly words. If the prepositional phrases were complete clauses with their own verbs, you would just use because and not because of :. Both because and because of can elaborate on the verb on the sentences.

However, neither use is interchangeable with due to. Due to is an adjective , which describes or modifies a noun. When combined with the rest of the sentence, it functions as an adjectival prepositional phrase. The verb to be and all its forms am, are, is, was, were are the key to telling because of and due to apart. If a sentence has a version of to be , use due to.

Here are some due to vs. The difference between these usages is subtle but important. If a sentence sounds awkward one day, you can always reword it to clarify your meaning. Many writers are more comfortable with due to at the beginning of a sentenc e than because of. They choose due to because they worry that starting a sentence with because might result in a sentence fragment. However, the opposite is actually correct. It seems like due to is modifying demand.

In that case, because of is the appropriate choice. However, if you ensure that the sentence is not a fragment , starting a sentence with because or because of is perfectly acceptable.

If you find the words due to the fact in your writing, edit them out immediately. Using the word fact is an unnecessarily wordy way to use due to. These sentences are technically correct, because due to modifies the noun fact.

Its use has been on a fairly steady decline since the 18th century, yet it is hardly to be regarded as obsolete, for it fits in quite well with a semi-formal style where we find many turns of phrase which are neither archaisms nor examples of today's passing fads.

I think that you could use either "for" or "because" for most anything that works for either one and it should be right even if it sounds weird. Though usually nowadays you only use "for" when further describing the previous noun rather than brining up a new noun in an explanation.

When using "for" to bring up a new point, as a reason, that doesn't reference the previous noun it sounds a little more funky. I think this is due to "for" meaning the expounding of reason or use nowadays, applying that connotation to the other function. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.

Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Asked 6 years, 6 months ago. Active 1 year, 9 months ago. Viewed 26k times. You don't say: I didn't go to school today for I felt ill. That would probably sound weird. You say instead: I didn't go to school today because I felt ill. Improve this question. Michael Rybkin. Michael Rybkin Michael Rybkin MLA 8 M, Emelda. Name required. Email required. Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment.

There is no need to resubmit your comment. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. Written by : Emelda M.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000